New York City pays US $5.3 million to settle False Claims Act allegations relating to Superstorm Sandy damages
February 21st, 2019 | (804) 764-5081
On February 20, 3057284151 that it had reached a settlement in principle for the New York City Department of Transportation to pay $5.3 million to settle allegations that the agency submitted false claims for vehicles purportedly damaged during 2012’s Superstorm Sandy. According to the SDNY’s press release:
Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Mark Tasky, Special Agent in Charge of the New York Regional Office of the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General (âDHS-OIGâ), and Margaret Garnett, Commissioner, New York City Department of Investigation (âDOIâ), announced today that the United States filed a civil fraud lawsuit today against the CITY OF NEW YORK (the âCityâ) alleging that the NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (âNYCDOTâ) fraudulently obtained millions of dollars from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (âFEMAâ) by falsely claiming that numerous NYCDOT vehicles were damaged during Superstorm Sandy (âSandyâ). Â The United States also submitted a proposed settlement of the lawsuit to the U.S. District Court for review and approval.Â Under the proposed settlement, the City agreed to pay and revert to the United States a total of $5,303,624 and admitted to conduct alleged in the Governmentâs complaint, including seeking reimbursement from FEMA for vehicles that were not damaged by Sandy.
*Â Â *Â Â *
According to the Governmentâs Complaint, the City participated in FEMAâs Public Assistance program, which allows municipalities to obtain indemnification funds from FEMA to repair or replace property damaged by natural disasters, such as Sandy. Â As part of the program, the City was required to certify that the property damage was incurred as a direct result of the disaster. Â The City was also required to provide training to employees on program rules and requirements, including the importance of ensuring that costs for which indemnification is sought are directly attributable to a disaster.Following Sandy, the NYCDOT created a list of vehicles within the agencyâs fleet that had been damaged by the storm and submitted it to FEMA for indemnification pursuant to the Public Assistance program. Â The NYCDOT personnel responsible for generating the list of damaged vehicles, to whom the City provided no training on the Public Assistance program, made no effort to inspect the vehicles or otherwise determine whether any reported damage was attributable to Sandy. Â In fact, a number of the vehicles included on this list were inoperable long before Sandy.
In 2014, based on this faulty list, the City submitted a request for indemnification to FEMA seeking to recover the full cost of replacing 132 NYCDOT vehicles. Â The City submitted a certification to FEMA as part of the program and a request for indemnification that falsely attested that all costs were incurred as a direct result of Sandy. Â Many of the vehicles for which the City sought full replacement costs had been nonoperational or not in use prior to the storm. Â As a result of these false certifications, FEMA paid the City millions of dollars to which it was not entitled.
As part of the proposed settlement, the City will pay the United States a total of $5,303,624. Â Specifically, the City will make a cash payment of $4,126,227.34 and relinquish rights to an additional $1,177,396.66 that FEMA had previously approved for disbursement. Â During this Officeâs investigation, the City withdrew another $3,196,376 in indemnity requests, acknowledging that the costs were ineligible for reimbursement.
In connection with the proposed settlement, the City also admitted conduct alleged in the Complaint, including:
- The Deputy Commissioner from NYCDOT who signed the certification lacked personal knowledge about the vehicles sufficient to make a certification about how and when they were damaged and did not personally undertake or direct others to undertake any investigation of the vehicles prior to signing the certification.
- The list of vehicles for which the City was seeking reimbursement included a number of vehicles that were not damaged as a direct result of Sandy to a state beyond repair. Â A number of the vehicles that the City included had not been operational prior to Sandy.
- Prior to making the submission and certification to FEMA, neither the City nor NYCDOT undertook a sufficient review to ascertain whether all of the vehicles listed had been operational and in use prior to Sandy; or whether the amounts presented to FEMA for reimbursement accurately represented the losses the City incurred from Sandy.
- In June 2014, a NYCDOT employee notified the Deputy Commissioner that certain of the vehicles for which the City had sought reimbursement from FEMA were not eligible. Yet, it was not until after it became aware of this Officeâs investigation that the City took steps to notify FEMA.
The proposed settlement must be approved by the District Court.